I thought that the digital peer review session was better than hard copy review sessions because there was more space to comment. We also didn't have to deal with passing papers back and forth.
So, in the end, how’d your WP2 paper go? What were you happy with? What weren’t you? Why? Be specific! (Remember: this is fodder for your end-of-quarter metacognitive reflection)
I thought that my WP2 went well. I don't think that my rough draft was very good, mainly because I was having trouble with its structure, but then I got it together for the final draft. I was having a little trouble trying to tie in the course readings with the writing project, but I think I did a good job with the tie ins that I did do. Overall, I though that I did a decent job.
Which 2 or 3 comments that you received yesterday were the most helpful for you? Why?
One comment that I relieved was that my thesis statement wasn't very clear, so I tweaked it a bit to make it more clear. Another comment was that I should analyze the moves more, so I did that.
List 5-10 genres that a younger audience (younger than you) typically reads/writes. Try to get specific—ie, “Adventure Novels – 6th graders.
Child learning to read-ABC book
5th grader-Fantasy novel
Junior High Student-Video game description
2nd Grader-Children's book
Highschooler-Tweet
List 5-10 genres that an older audience (older than you) typically reads/writes. Try to get specific—ie, “a LinkedIn profile – recent college graduates.”
Adult-Local Newspaper
Retired Man-Golf Magazine
Old medical patient-Medical Brochure
Someone who doesn't us the internet-Phone Book
Middle aged woman-Romance Novel
No comments:
Post a Comment